Tinjauan Etika Profesi TI pada Standar ACM-IEEE dan SKKNI: Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69533/2w2exa64Keywords:
ACM Code of Ethics, etika profesi teknologi informasi, IEEE Code of Ethics, SKKNI, systematic literature reviewAbstract
Etika profesi teknologi informasi telah banyak dibahas dalam literatur global melalui standar yang dikembangkan oleh Association for Computing Machinery dan Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers yang menekankan prinsip tanggung jawab sosial, kejujuran, serta pencegahan bahaya. Namun, penelitian sebelumnya lebih banyak berfokus pada konteks negara maju dan kurang memperhatikan adaptasi standar etika pada negara berkembang seperti Indonesia. Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia (SKKNI) cenderung menekankan kompetensi kerja dibandingkan pembahasan etika secara mendalam sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakselarasan dalam praktik profesi teknologi informasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan meninjau secara sistematis etika profesi teknologi informasi pada standar ACM–IEEE dan SKKNI untuk mengidentifikasi kesamaan, perbedaan, serta kesenjangan adaptasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) dengan pencarian literatur pada basis data Scopus, Google Scholar, dan ACM Digital Library. Dari pencarian awal diperoleh 100 artikel relevan. Setelah proses penyaringan berdasarkan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi, sebanyak 20 artikel dianalisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kesamaan pada prinsip tanggung jawab sosial, namun standar ACM–IEEE memberikan panduan lebih rinci terkait pencegahan bahaya dan privasi data dibandingkan SKKNI yang masih bersifat umum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi elemen etika global ke dalam SKKNI diperlukan untuk meningkatkan penerapan etika profesi teknologi informasi di Indonesia.
References
L. Floridi et al., “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations,” Minds Mach. (Dordr)., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 689–707, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
Association for Computing Machinery, “ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,” in ACM Conference on Computing Machinery, 2018, pp. 1–10. Accessed: Mar. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia, “Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia (SKKNI),” in National Conference on Workforce Development, 2022, pp. 1–50. Accessed: Mar. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://skkni.kemnaker.go.id/
M. Naufal, “Etika profesi IT di negara berkembang: Studi kasus Indonesia,” in Konferensi Teknologi Informasi, 2022, pp. 120–135.
M. A. Bruno, E. A. Walker, and H. H. Abujudeh, “Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction,” https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150023, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1668–1676, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150023.
M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” Mar. 29, 2021, BMJ Publishing Group. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
W. Knight, “Ethics in computing: Challenges and opportunities,” MIT Technol. Rev., vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 45–52, Mar. 2024.
A. Ramadhan, “Adaptasi standar etika IT di Indonesia: Tantangan dan solusi,” J. Teknologi Informasi Indonesia, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 78–95, Jan. 2025.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, “IEEE Code of Ethics,” in IEEE Conference on Ethics, 2020, pp. 1–5.
A. Lawson-Body, “Privacy and ethics in IT standards: Lessons from global frameworks,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 210–235, Mar. 2024.
Y. Wang, “Digital ethics in developing countries: A comparative study,” J. Inf. Ethics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 150–170, Feb. 2025.
S. M. Elias, “Cultural adaptations of IT ethics codes,” Ethics Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–62, Jan. 2025.
B. Tedja, “Systematic literature review using PRISMA: Exploring service quality and ethics,” Future Bus. J., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 45, Jan. 2024.
C. Holst, “Systematic reviews in ethics: Applying PRISMA in non-Western contexts,” Syst. Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 12, Jan. 2025.
M. Hakimi, S. Zarinkhail, and F. A. Sahnosh, “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reform in Developing Countries: Advancing Ethical, Rights-Based, and Accountable Digital Governance,” Jurnal Ilmiah Telsinas Elektro, Sipil dan Teknik Informasi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 127–144, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.38043/telsinas.v8i2.6934.
N. Brown, B. Xie, E. Sarder, C. Fiesler, and E. S. Wiese, “Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education Publications,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3634685.
R. ; Alidoosti et al., “VU Research Portal Ethics in Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review Ethics in Software Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review,” 2026.
A. et al. Sorathiya, “Ethical software requirements from user reviews: A systematic literature review,” in Int. Conf. Softw. Eng., 2024, pp. 1–10.
B. Balakrishnan, M. Nor, A. Azman, and S. Indartono, “Attitude towards Engineering Ethical Issues: A Comparative Study between Malaysian and Indonesian Engineering Undergraduates,” International Journal of Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p63.
C. M. Heldreth, E. P. Monk, A. T. Clark, C. Schumann, X. Eyee, and S. Ricco, “Which Skin Tone Measures Are the Most Inclusive? An Investigation of Skin Tone Measures for Artificial Intelligence,” ACM Journal on Responsible Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3632120.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riyan Ainur Rahman, Evy Nurmiati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
